Analysis of the Relationship between Energy Resources Consumption and Economic Growth in Turkey
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17381877Keywords:
Energy Resources, Economic Growth, Boron, Thorium, Granger Causality Test, Unit Root Tests, EKK TestsAbstract
Everything in the world is provided with an energy, and energy and its use are the most important resources for meeting the basic needs of humankind, which are indispensable for protecting, maintaining and raising the standard of living, since the first day of human existence on earth. In this context, a life without energy is unthinkable. The Turkish nation living on the Anatolian geography, which is in a very valuable and geostrategic place on the planet Earth, has very important and very valuable minerals and minerals. Strateko the 21st century (strategic and economic) role to play in the future of Turkey, which is a producer of boron minerals are indisputable size. The strategic, technological and economic importance of boron in the world is increasing day by day. The most important boron reserves having 72.3% of the world's boron reserves are in the western part of Turkey. Industrialization has a very important strategic role in the economic development and growth of countries. Countries are in great need of energy, mines and raw materials for industrialization. Nowadays, along with industrialization and technological developments, new types of production models as well as new types of products and advanced technological tools are used in the production process.
World energy consumption demand was realized as 13,760 million tons of oil equivalent (MTEP) as of the end of 2016. Approximately 19% of the energy consumption demand was consumed by North American countries, 14% by European countries, and 41% was consumed by Asia-Pacific countries. As of the end of 2016, 87% of the energy consumed in the world consists of fossil resources. In 2015, 42% of the world's total primary energy demand was used for electricity generation. Another precious metal of ours is "Thorium". Thorium was first discovered in 1828 by the Norwegian mineralogist Morten Thrane Esmark, but it was identified by the Swedish chemist Jons Jacob Berzelius and took its place in the periodic table. The element is named after Thor, who is accepted as the god of war in mythology. Thorium reserves are several hundred times higher than the world's uranium reserves. This shows the strategic importance of thorium in terms of energy production. There are sufficient thorium reserves in the world to meet the energy needs of humanity for thousands of years.
Energy sources can be divided into two according to their reusability. According to the said separation, resources are classified as renewable and non-renewable resources. Raw materials and natural resources are also included in the scope of (K) physical capital, which is included in the Cobb-Douglas production function. The (K) factor is important in the increase in production and acceleration of growth. Note that as (K) decreases, production decreases. When the relationship between the consumption of energy resources and economic growth is examined empirically, it is seen that empirical studies conducted in different countries, at different periods, using different methods have produced quite different results. Since there is no consensus in the results of empirical studies on the direction of the causality relationship between consumption of energy resources and economic growth, different perspective explanations are encountered in the literature. In order to explain these differences, four important theories have been developed which are explained below. These theories; "Growth", "protection", "neutrality" and "feedback" theories.
There is a Granger causality relationship between energy resource types and GNP. A one-way positive relationship has been determined from GNP to boron mine, electrical energy, oil, stone coal. It is possible to state the interpretation of the term slope and its effects as follows; * One unit increase in Boron Mine (with its logarithm) increases the GNP (with its logarithm) by 1.45 (when other variables are fixed). * One unit increase in Electrical Energy (whose logarithm is taken) increases the GNP (with its logarithm) by 2.63 (when the other variables are fixed). * One unit increase in the Hard Coal Mine (whose logarithm is taken) increases the GNP (with the logarithm) by 6,237 (when the other variables are fixed). * One unit increase in Lignite Coal Quantity (logarithm taken) raises GNP (logarithm taken) by 1.60 (other variables fixed). * One unit increase in Economic Growth Rate (logarithm taken) increases GNP (logarithm taken) by 6.99 (while other variables are constant). * One unit increase in the amount of oil (with its logarithm) increases the GNP (with its logarithm) by 1.54 (while the other variables are constant).
Downloads
References
Akarca, A. T., & Long, T. V. (1980). On the relationship between energy and GNP: A reexamination. Journal of Energy and Development, 5, 326–331.
Aksu, L. (2018). Türkiye’de bilim ve teknoloji ile iktisadi büyüme ilişkilerinin sosyal, ekonomik ve stratejik analizi. Social Sciences Studies Journal, 4(20), 2635–2670.
Aksu, L. (2020). Para arzı, enflasyon ve faiz oranları ile iktisadi büyüme ilişkisi: Türkiye örneği. In S. Öztürk (Ed.), Sürdürülebilir kalkınma, işletme, finans ve ekonomi: Teorik ve ampirik katkılar (pp. 115–218). İKSAD Publishing House.
Aksu, L. (2021). 21. Yüzyılda Türkiye'nin ekonomik, sosyal ve stratejik analizleri (1st ed., pp. 1–345). İKSAD Publishing House.
Aksu, L. (2024). Dünyada ve Türkiye’de nüfus politikaları ve analizleri: Strateji, teori ve kavramlar (1st ed., pp. 1–820). İKSAD Publishing House.
Altınay, G., & Karagöl, E. (2004). Structural break, unit root, and the causality between energy consumption and GDP in Turkey. Energy Economics, 26, 985–994.
Altınay, G., & Karagöl, E. (2005). Electricity consumption and economic growth: Evidence from Turkey. Energy Economics, 27, 854–855.
Aslan, A., & Öcal, O. (2016). The role of renewable energy consumption in economic growth: Evidence from asymmetric causality. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 60, 953–959.
Apergis, N., & Payne, J. E. (2010). Renewable energy consumption and growth in Eurasia. Energy Economics, 32(6), 1392–1397.
Apergis, N., & Payne, J. E. (2011). The renewable energy consumption–growth nexus in Central America. Applied Energy, 88(1), 343–347.
Apergis, N., & Danulețiu, D. C. (2014). Renewable energy and economic growth: Evidence from the sign of panel long-run causality. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 4(4), 578–587.
Arrow, K. J. (1962). The economic implications of learning by doing. Review of Economic Studies, 29, 155–173.
Aqeel, A., & Butt, M. S. (2001). The relationship between energy consumption and economic growth in Pakistan. Asia-Pacific Development Journal, 8(2), 101–110.
Bakırtaş, İ., & Çetin, M. A. (2016). Yenilenebilir enerji tüketimi ile ekonomik büyüme arasındaki ilişki: G-20 ülkeleri. Sosyoekonomi, 24(28), 131–145.
Barbier, E. B. (2011). Capitalizing on nature: Ecosystems as natural assets (pp. 45–60). Cambridge University Press.
Barro, R. J., & Sala-i-Martin, X. (2004). Economic growth (2nd ed., pp. 1–654). MIT Press.
Broyles, D. (2001). What is energy? (1st ed.). Trafford Publishing.
Bulut, Ü., & Muratoğlu, G. (2018). Renewable energy in Turkey: Great potential, low but increasing utilization, and an empirical analysis on renewable energy-growth nexus. Energy Policy, 123, 240–250.
Cobb, C. W., & Douglas, P. H. (1928). A theory of production. American Economic Review, 18(1), 139–165.
Destek, M. A., & Aslan, A. (2017). Renewable and non-renewable energy consumption and economic growth in emerging economies: Evidence from bootstrap panel causality. Renewable Energy, 111, 757–763.
Doğan, E. (2016). Analyzing the linkage between renewable and non-renewable energy consumption and economic growth by considering structural break in time-series data. Renewable Energy, 99, 1126–1136.
Durğun, B., & Durğun, F. (2018). Yenilenebilir enerji tüketimi ile ekonomik büyüme arasında nedensellik ilişkisi: Türkiye örneği. International Review of Economics and Management, 6(1), 1–27.
Eroğlu, G., & Şahiner, M. (2017). Dünyada ve Türkiye’de uranyum ve toryum (MTA Genel Müdürlüğü Yayınları, Maden Serisi No. 3). MTA, Ankara.
Georgescu-Roegen, N. (1971). The entropy law and the economic process. Harvard University Press.
Georgescu-Roegen, N. (1975). Energy and economic myths. Southern Economic Journal, 41(3), 347–381.
Glasure, Y. U., & Lee, A. R. (1997). Cointegration, error correction and the relationship between GDP and energy: The case of South Korea and Singapore. Resource and Energy Economics, 20(1), 17–25.
Goldemberg, J. (2000). World energy assessment: Energy and the challenge of sustainability. United Nations Development Programme.
Güngör, Ö. (2016). Enerji tüketimi ve ekonomik büyüme ilişkisi: VAR analizi (Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Balıkesir Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İktisat Anabilim Dalı, Balıkesir, Türkiye.
Hwang, D. B. K., & Gum, B. (1991). The causal relationship between energy and GNP: The case of Taiwan. The Journal of Energy and Development, 16(2), 219–226.
Ito, K. (2017). CO₂ emissions, renewable and non-renewable energy consumption, and economic growth: Evidence from panel data for developing countries. International Economics, 151, 1–6.
Jevons, W. S. (1865). The coal question: An inquiry concerning the progress of the nation, and the probable exhaustion of our coal-mines (pp. 132–140). Macmillan and Co.
Jumbe, C. (2004). Cointegration and causality between electricity consumption and GDP: Empirical evidence from Malawi. Energy Economics, 26(1), 61–68.
Kahia, M., Aissa, M. S. B., & Lanouar, C. (2017). Renewable and non-renewable energy use–economic growth nexus: The case of MENA net oil importing countries. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 71, 127–140.
Kalkınma Bakanlığı. (2018). 11. Kalkınma Planı (2019–2023): Enerji arz güvenliği ve verimliliği [ÖİK Raporu]. Ankara, Türkiye.
Karanfil, F. (2008). Energy consumption and economic growth revisited: Does the size of unrecorded economy matter? Energy Policy, 36, 3019–3025.
Kasperowicz, R., & Streimikiene, D. (2016). Economic growth and energy consumption: Comparative analysis of V4 and the “old” EU countries. Journal of International Studies, 9(2), 181–194.
Koçak, E., & Şarkgüneşi, A. (2017). The renewable energy and economic growth nexus in Black Sea and Balkan countries. Energy Policy, 100, 51–57.
Kraft, J., & Kraft, A. (1978). On the relationship between energy and GNP. The Journal of Energy and Development, 3, 401–403.
Kula, F. (2014). The long-run relationship between renewable electricity consumption and GDP: Evidence from panel data. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy, 9(2), 156–160.
Kuznets, S. (1955). Economic growth and income inequality. American Economic Review, 45(1), 1–28.
Lee, C.-C., & Chang, C. P. (2008). Energy consumption and economic growth in Asian economies: A more comprehensive analysis using panel data. Resource and Energy Economics, 30(1), 50–65.
Malthus, T. R. (1798). An essay on the principle of population (1st ed.). Oxford University Press.
Mankiw, N. G., Romer, D., & Weil, D. N. (1992). A contribution to the empirics of economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(2), 407–437.
Marques, A. C., & Fuinhas, J. A. (2012). Is renewable energy effective in promoting growth? Energy Policy, 46, 434–442.
Menegaki, A. N. (2011). Growth and renewable energy in Europe: A random effect model with evidence for neutrality hypothesis. Energy Economics, 33, 257–263.
Mucuk, M., & Uysal, D. (2009). Türkiye ekonomisinde enerji tüketimi ve ekonomik büyüme. Maliye Dergisi, 157, 105–115.
Narayan, P. K., & Smyth, R. (2008). Energy consumption and real GDP in G7 countries: New evidence from panel cointegration with structural breaks. Energy Economics, 30, 2331–2341.
Öcal, O., & Aslan, A. (2013). Renewable energy consumption–economic growth nexus in Turkey. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 28, 494–499.
Özaydın, Ö. (2019). Türkiye’de enerji tüketimindeki makro ekonomik etkileri (1. baskı, No. 15476). Gece Kitaplığı, Ankara.
Özsoy, C. (2008). Türk yükseköğretim sisteminin durumu ve iktisadi büyüme performansına katkısı. Niğde Üniversitesi, İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 1(2), 31–48.
Pamir, N. (2016). Enerjinin iktidarı (2. baskı, No. 327). Hayy Kitap.
Rafindadi, A. A., & Öztürk, I. (2017). Impacts of renewable energy consumption on the German economic growth: Evidence from combined cointegration test. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 75, 1130–1141.
Romer, P. M. (1986). Increasing returns and long-run growth. Journal of Political Economy, 94(5), 1002–1037.
Shahbaz, M., Loganathan, N., Zeshan, M., & Zaman, K. (2015). Does renewable energy consumption add in economic growth? An application of auto-regressive distributed lag model in Pakistan. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 44, 576–585.
Smil, V. (2008). Energy in nature and society: General energetics of complex systems. MIT Press.
Solow, R. M. (1956). A contribution to the theory of economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70(1), 65–94.
Sorrell, S., & Dimitropoulos, J. (2007). UKERC review of evidence for the rebound effect, technical report 5: Energy, productivity and economic growth studies. UKERC Report Working Paper, UKERC/WP/TPA/2007/013, 1–192.
Soytaş, U., & Sari, R. (2009). Energy consumption, economic growth, and carbon emissions: Challenges faced by an EU candidate member. Ecological Economics, 68(6), 1667–1675.
Stern, D. I. (1993). Energy and economic growth in the USA: A multivariate approach. Energy Economics, 15(2), 137–150.
Şengül, S., & Tuncer, İ. (2006). Türkiye’de enerji tüketimi ve ekonomik büyüme: 1960–2000. İktisat, İşletme ve Finans, 21, 69–80.
Şentürk, İ. (2012). Kaynaklarına göre enerji tüketiminin ekonomik büyümeye etkileri (Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi). Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İktisat Anabilim Dalı, Ankara, Türkiye.
Terzi, H. (1998). Türkiye'de elektrik tüketimi ve ekonomik büyüme ilişkisi: Sektörel bir karşılaştırma. İktisat, İşletme ve Finans, 13(144), 62–71.
Tuğcu, C. T., Öztürk, I., & Aslan, A. (2012). Renewable and non-renewable energy consumption and economic growth relationship revisited: Evidence from G7 countries. Energy Economics, 34(6), 1942–1950.
Uzunöz, M., & Akçay, Y. (2012). Türkiye’de büyüme ve enerji tüketimi arasındaki nedensellik ilişkisi: 1970–2010. Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 3(2), 1–16.
Wackernagel, M., & Rees, W. (1996). Our ecological footprint: Reducing human impact on the Earth (pp. 101–115). New Society Publishers.
Yenmez, N. (2009). Stratejik bir maden olarak bor minerallerin Türkiye için önemi. İstanbul Üniversitesi, Edebiyat Fakültesi Coğrafya Bölümü, Coğrafya Dergisi, 19, 59–94.
Yıldırım, H. H., & Sakarya, Ş. (2016). Economic growth and CO₂ emissions in Turkey. In Proceedings of the 8th International Ege Energy Symposium (pp. 294–304). Afyonkarahisar, Turkey.
Yu, E. S. H., & Hwang, B.-K. (1984). The relationship between energy and GNP, further results. Energy Economics, 6, 186–190.
Yu, E. S. H., & Choi, J. Y. (1985). The causal relationship between energy and GNP: An international comparison. The Journal of Energy and Development, 10(2), 249–272.
Yu, E. S. H., & Jin, J. C. (1992). Cointegration tests of energy consumption, income, and employment. Resources and Energy, 14, 259–266.
ELEKTRONİK ADRESLER:
• http://www.maden.org.tr/genel/bizden_detay.php?kod=117&tipi =5&sube=0; erişim tarihi: 05.04. 2019.
• https://www.kozbilge.com/2014/10/nufus-ve-enerji-iliskisi.html; erişim tarihi:05.04. 2023.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 EUROASIA JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES & HUMANITIES

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.