UNITY OR SEPARATION? MACROECONOMIC POWER OF THE ORGANIZATION OF TURKIC STATES

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15767764

Keywords:

The Organization of Turkic States, Macroeconomic Indicators, Multi Criteria Decision Making, CRITIC, EDAS

Abstract

The Turkish states that gained independence following the Soviet Union's collapse began fostering relationships with Turkey, the remnants of the Ottoman Empire. Over time, these connections have strengthened across various domains, allowing Turks to assert themselves historically over a vast region. As many nations with shared interests have restructured, it has become increasingly crucial for Turks to gain influence in global politics. To promote extensive cooperation among Turkish-speaking countries, these nations established the Cooperation Council of Turkic-speaking States, which has now evolved into the Organization of Turkic States. It is essential to evaluate the current economic power of the Turkish states in the context of global politics and to address whether they are still separated or united. This study seeks to evaluate the macroeconomic strength of the Turkish Union using multi-criteria decision-making methods. Initially, the macroeconomic power of Turkey within the G20 (excluding the EU) was assessed using a baseline model. The analysis included the macroeconomic performance of the full members of the Organization of Turkic States in the first scenario, and both full and observer member countries (excluding Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus) in the second scenario. Key indicators such as gross domestic product, total reserves, labour force, and the export-to-import ratio were utilized to evaluate the macroeconomic power of these countries. The CRITIC (Criteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation) method was used to weight the criteria, followed by the EDAS (Evaluation based on Distance from Average Solution) method to rank the countries' performances. Turkey was positioned 17th in the baseline model, while the Organization of Turkic States placed 12th in the first scenario and 10th in the second scenario. The Turkish Union is emerging as a more significant economic force compared to strong economies like the United Kingdom, Canada, France, Italy, and South Korea. This study shows that the Organization of Turkic States presents an opportunity for Turkic nations to develop a robust and thriving society across various sectors, particularly in the economy, and to emerge as a sustainable economic force.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Muhammed Ordu, Osmaniye Korkut Ata University, Faculty of Engineering and Natural Science, Department of Industrial Engineering, Osmaniye, Turkey

Dr. Muhammed Ordu is an Associate Professor in the Department of Industrial Engineering at Osmaniye Korkut Ata University in Turkey. He completed his PhD in the research field of Applied Statistics and Operational Research at the University of Hertfordshire. His research areas are healthcare modelling, economics, forecasting, simulation and optimization. He is also interested in engineering economy and financial topics.

Nazlı Tekman, Osmaniye Korkut Ata University, Osmaniye Vocational School, Osmaniye, Turkey

Dr. Nazlı Tekman is a lecturer in the Osmaniye Vocational School at Osmaniye Korkut Ata University in Turkey. She completed her PhD in the research field of Economic Policy at the Atatürk University in Turkey. Her research areas are economics, growth, economic policies and monetary policy.

References

Al, İ., & Demirel, S. R. (2022). Türkiye'nin Makroekonomik Performansının TOPSIS Yöntemiyle Değerlendirilmesi: 2002-2019 Dönemi. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 9(1), 202-222. https://doi.org/10.30798/makuiibf.860476

Altay Topçu, B., & Oralhan, B. (2017). Türkiye ve OECD Ülkeleri’nin Temel Makroekonomik Göstergeler Açısından Çok Kriterli Karar Verme Yöntemleri ile Karşılaştırılması. International Journal of Academic Value Studies, 3(14), 260-277. http://dx.doi.org/10.23929/javs.304

Arsu, T. (2022). Assessment of Macroeconomic Performances and Human Development Levels of BRICS and MINT Countries Using CRITIC and COPRAS Methods. Pacific Business Review, 14(10), 1-19.

Belke, M. (2020). CRITIC ve MAIRCA Yöntemleriyle G7 Ülkelerinin Makroekonomik Performansının Değerlendirilmesi. İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 19(Özel Ek), 120-139.

Bulut, M. S., Ordu, M., Der, O., & Basar, G. (2024). Sustainable Thermoplastic Material Selection for Hybrid Vehicle Battery Packs in the Automotive Industry: A Comparative Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach. Polymers, 16(19), 2768. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16192768

Coşkun, A. E. (2022). BRICS-T Ekonomilerinin Makroekonomik Performanslarının Değerlendirilmesi: Entropi Tabanlı WASPAS Yaklaşımı. İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 21(45), 1320-1340. https://doi.org/10.46928/iticusbe.1134477

Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., & Papayannakis, L. (1995). Determining Objective Weights in Multiple Criteria Problems: The CRITIC Method. Computers & Operations Research, 22, 763–770. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-0548(94)00059-H

Doğan, H. (2022). Türkiye’nin Makroekonomik Performansının 2010-2020 Yılları İçin CRITIC Temelli ARAS Yöntemi ile Değerlendirilmesi. Asya Studies - Academic Social Studies / Akademik Sosyal Araştırmalar, 6(19), 189-202. https://doi.org/10.31455/asya.1027906

Ersoy N. (2023). MEREC-MULTIMOOSRAL Modeli ile OECD Ülkelerinin Makroekonomik Performanslarının Değerlendirilmesi. Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 14(2), 471-491. https://doi.org/10.36362/gumus.1203999

Ghorabaee, M. K., Zavadskas, E. K., Olfat, L., & Turskis, Z. (2015). Multi-Criteria Inventory Classification Using a New Method of Evaluation Based on Distance from Average Solution (EDAS). Informatica, 26(3), 435–451. https://doi.org/10.15388/Informatica.2015.57

Hokka, C., & Bektaş S. (2024). ÇKKV Yöntemleriyle Makroekonomik Performans Ölçümü: 2021-2022 Dönemi D8 Ülkeleri Örneği. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 33(1), 397-420. https://doi.org/10.35379/cusosbil.1404618

Işık, C., Türkkan, M., Marbou, S., & Gül, S. (2024). Stock Market Performance Evaluation of Listed Food and Beverage Companies in Istanbul Stock Exchange with MCDM Methods. Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 7(2), 35–64. https://doi.org/10.31181/dmame722024692

Jahan, A., Mustapha, F., Sapuan, S.M., Ismail, M.Y., & Bahraminasab, M. (2012). A Framework for Weighting of Criteria in Ranking Stage of Material Selection Process. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 58, 411-420. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-011-3366-7

Pınar, A., Yıldırım, M. & Erdoğan, S. (2023). COVID Dönemi ve Sonrası Türkiye Ekonomisinin Performansının CRITIC, TOPSIS ve MABAC Yöntemleri ile Ölçülmesi. KMÜ Sosyal ve Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi, 25(44), 433-449.

Republic of Turkey Ministry of Foreign Affairs, (2024). Organization of Turkic States. Available at: https://www.mfa.gov.tr/turk-konseyi.tr.mfa (accessed 26 September 2024)

The Organization of Turkic States, (2024). Available at: https://www.turkicstates.org/tr (accessed 26 September 2024)

Uludağ, A. S. & Ümit, A. Ö. (2020). Türk Dünyası Ülkelerinin Katma Değerli Üretim ve Makroekonomik Performanslarının DEMATEL ve COPRAS Yöntemleriyle Analizi. Sosyoekonomi, 28(45), 139-164. https://doi.org/10.17233/sosyoekonomi.2020.03.09

World Bank Open Data. (2024). Available at: https://data.worldbank.org/ (accessed 26 September 2024)

Yapa, K., Durmus, M., Tayyar, N., & Akbulut, İ. (2020). Comparison of the European Union Countries and Turkey's Macroeconomic Indicators with Best Worst Method. In Handbook of Research on Social and Economic Development in the European Union (pp. 204-219). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-1188-6.ch012

Published

2025-06-29

How to Cite

Ordu, M., & Tekman, N. (2025). UNITY OR SEPARATION? MACROECONOMIC POWER OF THE ORGANIZATION OF TURKIC STATES. EUROASIA JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES & HUMANITIES, 12(3), 13–26. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15767764

Issue

Section

Articles